forge - random thought
Is the purpose of the Church to return to the New Testament Church experience – no money, no buildings, under the radar, and with no influence
or….
Is it to be the people of God in the context and environment we have, with the resources that we have?

February 19th, 2005 at 2:14 pm
I don’t believe there needs to be a choice. Allowing that some of the comment on the N/T church is arguable, you can do both.
February 19th, 2005 at 2:32 pm
What would that mean for Sydney Anglicans? One of the most wealthiest land owners in Sydney.
February 20th, 2005 at 1:49 pm
I am not a great believer in a denomination acquiring property so I don’t believe they should have such a portfolio.
February 20th, 2005 at 4:41 pm
Phil, I’d have to say the latter….lot’s of reasons which I’m sure you know all about. Grace.
February 20th, 2005 at 5:37 pm
Homer, why do you think denominations shouldn’t acquire property and does this extend to the local church too?
Paul, yeah I agree. I feel that this desire to rebuild the NT church is flawed somewhat if taken too far.
February 21st, 2005 at 10:44 am
It isn’t part of what their goal is about.
Property and building and developing he church are two different things.
February 21st, 2005 at 10:51 am
So, do you think this extends to the local church too?
When you say “their” do you mean the head office of the denomination or the denomination as a whole?
February 21st, 2005 at 12:48 pm
both
August 24th, 2005 at 9:47 am
This site is truly a great resource thanks for all your hard work