<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: upgrading</title>
	<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/</link>
	<description>musings from those on the journey</description>
	<pubDate>Fri,  5 Dec 2008 00:56:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125784</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125784</guid>
		<description>relax guys... as I said I will look at that recent comments thread issue tonight.

The text of the posts seem to me to be much easier to read on my screen than the old format. Do you find the post text more difficult to read - if so can you pin point why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>relax guys&#8230; as I said I will look at that recent comments thread issue tonight.</p>
<p>The text of the posts seem to me to be much easier to read on my screen than the old format. Do you find the post text more difficult to read - if so can you pin point why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bec</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125783</link>
		<dc:creator>Bec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 06:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125783</guid>
		<description>I'm converting too!  I liked the old one a LOT better...this one's really hard to read (especially the most recent comments - you can't tell which thread they're on)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m converting too!  I liked the old one a LOT better&#8230;this one&#8217;s really hard to read (especially the most recent comments - you can&#8217;t tell which thread they&#8217;re on)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the rev</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125780</link>
		<dc:creator>the rev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 04:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125780</guid>
		<description>I am converting to conservativism like Lance, I like the old one better

:)

the rev</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am converting to conservativism like Lance, I like the old one better</p>
<p> <img src='http://www.signposts.org.au/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>the rev</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125778</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 03:14:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125778</guid>
		<description>Yeah it is annoying Ned.. the last one was much better.
I will have a look at that tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it is annoying Ned.. the last one was much better.<br />
I will have a look at that tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ned flanders</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125776</link>
		<dc:creator>ned flanders</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2006 01:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125776</guid>
		<description>How do you tell the different topics on the recent comments list??????????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do you tell the different topics on the recent comments list??????????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125774</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125774</guid>
		<description>I have also reduced the font size for those that thought it too large.  Let me know if it is annoying to others - I don't have time to check it at different resolutions and on different browsers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have also reduced the font size for those that thought it too large.  Let me know if it is annoying to others - I don&#8217;t have time to check it at different resolutions and on different browsers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125773</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125773</guid>
		<description>Yay, fixed!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yay, fixed!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125772</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125772</guid>
		<description>Darren we use SpamKarma, which we have been fairly happy with, except for the occasional false positive.  Andy, thanks for the tip, we will fix that up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darren we use SpamKarma, which we have been fairly happy with, except for the occasional false positive.  Andy, thanks for the tip, we will fix that up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125771</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125771</guid>
		<description>"The page behaves differently in Firefox and IE - if you are looking at this in IE you won’t see our heading, but you will if you are looking at it in Firefox. We (including our internet guru guy) haven’t been able to figure that one out yet."

It's because you're missing a "&#62;" character in your header div - the link tag needs the "&#62;" at the end</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The page behaves differently in Firefox and IE - if you are looking at this in IE you won’t see our heading, but you will if you are looking at it in Firefox. We (including our internet guru guy) haven’t been able to figure that one out yet.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s because you&#8217;re missing a &#8220;&gt;&#8221; character in your header div - the link tag needs the &#8220;&gt;&#8221; at the end</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: darren</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125761</link>
		<dc:creator>darren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/01/29/upgrading/#comment-125761</guid>
		<description>i went to the football with rach and regan...

the bug fixes shes linked to are actually rather handy...

have you tried Akismet spam protection?  it comes with WP2.0 as long as you have a wordpress.com account, it's not too shabby at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i went to the football with rach and regan&#8230;</p>
<p>the bug fixes shes linked to are actually rather handy&#8230;</p>
<p>have you tried Akismet spam protection?  it comes with WP2.0 as long as you have a wordpress.com account, it&#8217;s not too shabby at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
