Unfreezing move #4 - unfreezing the congregation for ministry

We are continuing our look at the book by Bill Easum - Unfreezing Moves - Following Jesus into the mission field

The other posts in the series can be found here

Unfreezing Move #4 - Unfreezing the congregation for ministry

Some interesting assumptions are made by Easum at the beginning of this move. Firstly, he states:

“When a congregation is free of major conflict and indigenous worship is in place, its time to mobilize the congregation for ministry” (p104).

While I understand and agree that resolving major conflict is a matter of priority, I don’t understand why you would need to address worship before missional action. The danger here is that Churches never actual feel that they have addressed the move of indigenous worship sufficiently to then address this move of mobilising for ministry. The result then is that the Church would be stuck and this is exactly what Easum seeks to address. I would also suggest that indiginous worship will be enriched and enhanced as the Church engages in missional action. Jesus models in Mark’s gospel that we are to be people of the way – do we not experience God in missional action? Worship can enrich, nurture and support but it is not the goal nor in my opinion is it the move to complete before you move to missional action.

Easum then suggests that Church leaders should:

“Recruit fifty to seventy-five people who are ready and willing to be coached in their faith development” (p105).

In the Australian context, numbers such as these would preclude most Churches. In our context a much smaller number of six to twelve people would be more realistic. However, Easum point is valid - one of the first steps in mobilising the Church for minitry is to identify people who can be coached and nurtured as key people

Another interesting point that Easum makes is that we need to move from the laity doing administration and the staff doing ministry to the laity doing ministry and the staff doing administration. This shift is evidenced in many churches today and sometimes is forced upon the Church by the size of the organization. In larger churches it is simply impossible for a monthly meeting to run the administration of the church or even for part timers to manage the Church and so the staff are delegated this responsibility. This shift also has the advantage of releasing more people into missional action rather than serving on committees.

Easum spends some time looking at how the leadership task should be viewed as multipication and not addition. He borrows a fractal image of leadership from Wayne Cordeiro (www.newhope-hawii.org) and says:

“Fractaling is the constant repitition of leadership over and over. It is everyone training to be a leader. Every leader asks, who can I get to help me on this mission? And how can I break this project down into small enough pieces to include lots of people in the mission.” (p108).

This makes sense and sees the role of the minister/leader to “equip the saints”. The challenge is that many ministers became ministers because they wanted to “do ministry” – they have felt a call to pastoral work or simply like being the centre of attention and leading each program. For fractural leadership to function and for the Church to be mobilised, ministers need to resist the temptation to do everything themselves and set aside pride, honour or glory.

Easum lists four keys to multiplying leaders:

“1. pastors understand that their primary fractal or hub is their flock rather than the whole congregation, and they spend most of their time with them.

2. No one is responsible for more than four people, plus their spouses, so every ten people have a shepherd (spouses are included!)

3. Instead of asking a few people to do a lot, ask a lot of people to do only what they love doing and hold them accountable.

4. Focus the amount of time people have to spend in ministry on those things they are gifted to do. This way no one burns out.” (p109)

3 Responses to “Unfreezing move #4 - unfreezing the congregation for ministry”

  1. 1
    ross daws Says:

    hmmm…

    Phil said: “I don’t understand why you would need to address worship before missional action.” I would go further, and would challenge whether you really are addressing worship if you’re not addressing missional action. If the church exists as the vehicle of God’s mission to God’s creation, then surely what we’re doing can’t be considered worship if it doesn’t in some way take up the challenge of the mission? If we think of mission flowing out of worship, I’d suggest we have a serious case of putting the cart before the horse. Mission is our ultimate act of spiritual worship, and while I’m not saying that working the soup kitchen (for instance) would be a community’s sole act of corporate worship, to shape the community around worship before mission is already to have missed the point.

    His thoughts about Fractaling are interesting but (to my mind) address some of the symptoms rather than some of the causes. In the community I’m a part of, one of the ministers used to spend roughly 12 hours a week working on the sermon for that Sunday. Taking a conservative estimate that they only worked 60 hours a week, that’s 20% of that person’s time spent on one portion of the Sunday worship service. I’m not trying to denegrade the importance of teaching the community, but it seems to me that part of the reason the church is so frozen in its ruts is because we invest so much of our time and resources on that ‘one hour on Sunday’ compared with the amount of time we invest in the rest of the life of the community. Once again, I’d suggest that if we ‘ordered’ (so to speak) our communities around being missional communities rather than around being communities who gather for worship at X time then we would be a lot closer to addressing the root cause of some of the problems which Easum seems to be picking up on. Of course, that probably doesn’t fit so well into a book/chapter about “unfreezing a congregation for ministry” given that it presupposes a congregational structure revolving around attendance-membership and the worship service… but I do wonder whether making that concession is a bit like saying “while working with the fact that our feet are tied together and our hands are bound behind our backs, this is how we can go about running a marathon.” Perhaps the time has to come when we acknowledge that in order to run the marathon, we must untie our hands and feet?

  2. 2
    phil Says:

    Well said Ross.

  3. 3
    bec Says:

    Ditto, well said.

    I’d add that it’s not just about gathering for worship at a set time, but it’s about strong hierarchies also - at a realllly basic level, think of the impact if it wasn’t always that minister giving the sermon, but various members of the congregations that were talented/interested in giving it?