<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meet the Forkers</title>
	<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/</link>
	<description>musings from those on the journey</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 01:14:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: mn</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162273</link>
		<dc:creator>mn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162273</guid>
		<description>Lance

listened to the Rudd interview at 25 above.

Hard mix I think - politics and being a Christian - I like to think he's hanging in there.

Thanks

MN</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lance</p>
<p>listened to the Rudd interview at 25 above.</p>
<p>Hard mix I think - politics and being a Christian - I like to think he&#8217;s hanging in there.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>MN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Whale</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162272</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Whale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 12:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162272</guid>
		<description>sorry accidentally put @ in there. It should be

http://progressioncsj.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry accidentally put @ in there. It should be</p>
<p><a href="http://progressioncsj.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow">http://progressioncsj.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zulu</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162271</link>
		<dc:creator>zulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162271</guid>
		<description>that is an e-mail address not a URL.  If you go to progressioncsj.blogpost.com you arrive at a fundo site.  Can you give us another go at a URL?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is an e-mail address not a URL.  If you go to progressioncsj.blogpost.com you arrive at a fundo site.  Can you give us another go at a URL?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma Whale</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162263</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma Whale</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Apr 2007 10:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-162263</guid>
		<description>Don't know if this is right post but for everyone out there sick of conservative Christians getting all the political attention, ADHDLibrarian  and I have started a political lobby group called Progression: Christians for Social Justice. Check it out at progressioncsj@blogspot.com 

Actually it's funny, I was interviewed last week by my local paper about Progresison, and signposts scored a big mention because adhd and I reconnected thorugh this website after having known each other about a decade ago. 

so if you are interested have a look</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t know if this is right post but for everyone out there sick of conservative Christians getting all the political attention, ADHDLibrarian  and I have started a political lobby group called Progression: Christians for Social Justice. Check it out at <a href="mailto:progressioncsj@blogspot.com">progressioncsj@blogspot.com</a> </p>
<p>Actually it&#8217;s funny, I was interviewed last week by my local paper about Progresison, and signposts scored a big mention because adhd and I reconnected thorugh this website after having known each other about a decade ago. </p>
<p>so if you are interested have a look</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lance</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-156780</link>
		<dc:creator>Lance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-156780</guid>
		<description>Kevin Rudd talks on Christian faith matters.

http://www.historymakersradio.com/HM-KRudd%20Web%20Edit.mp3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kevin Rudd talks on Christian faith matters.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.historymakersradio.com/HM-KRudd%20Web%20Edit.mp3" rel="nofollow">http://www.historymakersradio.com/HM-KRudd%20Web%20Edit.mp3</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152445</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Dec 2006 23:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152445</guid>
		<description>Will do, but at this rate might be in the new year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will do, but at this rate might be in the new year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg the explorer</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152255</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg the explorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152255</guid>
		<description>Dan, a series on Bonhoeffer would be great - perhaps even a series on several different Theologians -Barth, Lisa, Homer - even Marge!  (Although I'm joking about Marge - too liberal even for me - a series would be great!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, a series on Bonhoeffer would be great - perhaps even a series on several different Theologians -Barth, Lisa, Homer - even Marge!  (Although I&#8217;m joking about Marge - too liberal even for me - a series would be great!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152233</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 08:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152233</guid>
		<description>Perhaps there's hope for the ALP!

True, you can't provide nothing positive while in opposition or you just sound like a pack of whingers. I still think you need a couple of fresh rabbits to pull out of the hat while in election mode to get people talking when it counts... ie when they are about to vote.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps there&#8217;s hope for the ALP!</p>
<p>True, you can&#8217;t provide nothing positive while in opposition or you just sound like a pack of whingers. I still think you need a couple of fresh rabbits to pull out of the hat while in election mode to get people talking when it counts&#8230; ie when they are about to vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152232</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 07:24:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152232</guid>
		<description>True, Janet, but you then run the risk of the Government setting the agenda and you running a long way behind. The Government is constantly polling the electorate on their concerns anyway, so it won't take an ALP policy to alert them to the electoral potential of any one issue. 

"Luke, Dan… you guys should be employed by the ALP" One of us already is  :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True, Janet, but you then run the risk of the Government setting the agenda and you running a long way behind. The Government is constantly polling the electorate on their concerns anyway, so it won&#8217;t take an ALP policy to alert them to the electoral potential of any one issue. </p>
<p>&#8220;Luke, Dan… you guys should be employed by the ALP&#8221; One of us already is  <img src='http://www.signposts.org.au/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janet</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152228</link>
		<dc:creator>Janet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 06:09:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2006/12/05/meet-the-forkers/#comment-152228</guid>
		<description>Luke, Dan...  you guys should be employed by the ALP... great comments.

Rudd needs a new PR person. "Fork in the Road" and "Bridge too Far" are even lamer than Downer's ill fated "the things that matter" mantra... for those old enough to remember that embarassing political episode. (I think he sealed his electoral coffin with the joke about his domestic violence policy being "the things that batter"... probably the fishnet stocking episode didn't help either... uggh)

Electorally speaking, my only concern about putting policies upfront too far before an election is that any policies that strike a chord with the electorate are promptly stolen by John Howard... or he at least borrows the rhetoric and promises an adapted version of this policy some time. Which may be good for governance, but not for winning an election. I think you need "election momentum" with some significant populist policies hidden up your sleeve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Luke, Dan&#8230;  you guys should be employed by the ALP&#8230; great comments.</p>
<p>Rudd needs a new PR person. &#8220;Fork in the Road&#8221; and &#8220;Bridge too Far&#8221; are even lamer than Downer&#8217;s ill fated &#8220;the things that matter&#8221; mantra&#8230; for those old enough to remember that embarassing political episode. (I think he sealed his electoral coffin with the joke about his domestic violence policy being &#8220;the things that batter&#8221;&#8230; probably the fishnet stocking episode didn&#8217;t help either&#8230; uggh)</p>
<p>Electorally speaking, my only concern about putting policies upfront too far before an election is that any policies that strike a chord with the electorate are promptly stolen by John Howard&#8230; or he at least borrows the rhetoric and promises an adapted version of this policy some time. Which may be good for governance, but not for winning an election. I think you need &#8220;election momentum&#8221; with some significant populist policies hidden up your sleeve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.629 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->