to whom it may concern
To the person who was previously banned - by the way, our one and only banned commenter despite significant pressure.
We see you have began commenting again. You are welcome to stay but you are on probation. A reading of the guidelines is important for your continuing presence here.
February 1st, 2007 at 5:33 pm
Yes - Behave yourself or you will be put back on the “naughty chair”!
February 1st, 2007 at 5:46 pm
They ban people from signposts? I thought this was an all encompassing forum
February 1st, 2007 at 5:54 pm
I retract my previous comment. I have only just read the site guidlines for the first time then, and realize that it must have been really extreme for that person to be banned previously. Apologies Dan and Phil
February 1st, 2007 at 7:08 pm
I’m really curious as to who it was…. And I’m going to guess lionfish?
February 1st, 2007 at 7:52 pm
You think so? I’m guessing ned flanders (been trolling through old posts)
February 2nd, 2007 at 8:21 am
Why Lionfish…?
emanresu, Lionfish never breaches the policy guidelines: you heretic!
February 2nd, 2007 at 8:42 am
I don’t know.. it’s just this gut feeling. It may not be the truth.. but it’s certainly got an aspect of truthiness to it!
February 2nd, 2007 at 8:50 am
emanresu - Support your assertion with fact-that’s right … Christians don’t like facts. You are starting to sound like a CCC adherent.
February 2nd, 2007 at 9:43 am
Facts? What facts? I don’t need facts. I feel it in my spirit… so it has to be true! A couple thousand other people who agree with me can’t be wrong. You’re the one who’s wrong!
February 2nd, 2007 at 10:22 am
I just like that LF feels free to refer to himself in the 3rd person…
Gives an air of enigmaticness.
No - LF would never breach guidelines, it was Stumpy.
February 2nd, 2007 at 12:28 pm
Is it the one who rhymes with Flanders?
February 2nd, 2007 at 9:06 pm
It ws not stumpy and stumpy would have you know that we are not pleased with your assertion!