Comments on: to whom it may concern http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/ musings from those on the journey Sun, 28 Dec 2008 06:21:59 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3 By: Greg the explorer http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155627 Greg the explorer Fri, 02 Feb 2007 11:06:25 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155627 It ws not stumpy and stumpy would have you know that we are not pleased with your assertion! It ws not stumpy and stumpy would have you know that we are not pleased with your assertion!

]]> By: Grace Required http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155543 Grace Required Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:28:21 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155543 Is it the one who rhymes with Flanders? Is it the one who rhymes with Flanders?

]]> By: Toddy http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155522 Toddy Fri, 02 Feb 2007 00:22:10 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155522 I just like that LF feels free to refer to himself in the 3rd person... Gives an air of enigmaticness. No - LF would never breach guidelines, it was Stumpy. I just like that LF feels free to refer to himself in the 3rd person…

Gives an air of enigmaticness.

No - LF would never breach guidelines, it was Stumpy.

]]> By: emanresu http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155517 emanresu Thu, 01 Feb 2007 23:43:20 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155517 Facts? What facts? I don't need facts. I feel it in my spirit... so it has to be true! A couple thousand other people who agree with me can't be wrong. You're the one who's wrong! Facts? What facts? I don’t need facts. I feel it in my spirit… so it has to be true! A couple thousand other people who agree with me can’t be wrong. You’re the one who’s wrong!

]]> By: Lionfish http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155514 Lionfish Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:50:13 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155514 emanresu - Support your assertion with fact-that's right ... Christians don't like facts. You are starting to sound like a CCC adherent. :-) emanresu - Support your assertion with fact-that’s right … Christians don’t like facts. You are starting to sound like a CCC adherent. :-)

]]> By: emanresu http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155513 emanresu Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:42:25 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155513 I don't know.. it's just this gut feeling. It may not be the truth.. but it's certainly got an aspect of truthiness to it! I don’t know.. it’s just this gut feeling. It may not be the truth.. but it’s certainly got an aspect of truthiness to it!

]]> By: Lionfish http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155509 Lionfish Thu, 01 Feb 2007 22:21:27 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155509 Why Lionfish...? emanresu, Lionfish never breaches the policy guidelines: you heretic! :-) Why Lionfish…?

emanresu, Lionfish never breaches the policy guidelines: you heretic! :-)

]]> By: Acts17:11 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155490 Acts17:11 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:52:17 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155490 You think so? I'm guessing ned flanders (been trolling through old posts) You think so? I’m guessing ned flanders (been trolling through old posts)

]]> By: emanresu http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155489 emanresu Thu, 01 Feb 2007 09:08:37 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155489 I'm really curious as to who it was.... And I'm going to guess lionfish? I’m really curious as to who it was…. And I’m going to guess lionfish?

]]> By: Acts17:11 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155488 Acts17:11 Thu, 01 Feb 2007 07:54:07 +0000 http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/02/01/to-whom-it-may-concern/#comment-155488 I retract my previous comment. I have only just read the site guidlines for the first time then, and realize that it must have been really extreme for that person to be banned previously. Apologies Dan and Phil I retract my previous comment. I have only just read the site guidlines for the first time then, and realize that it must have been really extreme for that person to be banned previously. Apologies Dan and Phil

]]>