<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Fleece For Fun &#38; Profit II</title>
	<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/</link>
	<description>musings from those on the journey</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 03:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: wakey74</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-176410</link>
		<dc:creator>wakey74</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Aug 2007 00:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-176410</guid>
		<description>"The tax-fraud conviction Friday of the pastor of one of Birmingham’s largest churches may have reverberations in the way ministers accept and report gifts."

"Churches that pay honorariums to visiting ministers routinely file a Form 1099, and the individuals are expected to claim it as income on their tax forms, Neptune said.

“The IRS is going to classify that as income," Connor said. “It’s really for services that have been performed."

In Clarke’s case, when churches paid him as a guest speaker and filed a Form 1099, he claimed it on his taxes, according to prosecutors during his trial. When churches didn’t file a 1099, he didn’t claim it as income."

http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20070723/NEWS/707230312/1007/RSS&#38;source=RSS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The tax-fraud conviction Friday of the pastor of one of Birmingham’s largest churches may have reverberations in the way ministers accept and report gifts.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Churches that pay honorariums to visiting ministers routinely file a Form 1099, and the individuals are expected to claim it as income on their tax forms, Neptune said.</p>
<p>“The IRS is going to classify that as income,&#8221; Connor said. “It’s really for services that have been performed.&#8221;</p>
<p>In Clarke’s case, when churches paid him as a guest speaker and filed a Form 1099, he claimed it on his taxes, according to prosecutors during his trial. When churches didn’t file a 1099, he didn’t claim it as income.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20070723/NEWS/707230312/1007/RSS&amp;source=RSS" rel="nofollow">http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/article/20070723/NEWS/707230312/1007/RSS&amp;source=RSS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asd</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161186</link>
		<dc:creator>Asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 06:02:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161186</guid>
		<description>er, I did!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>er, I did!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: arti1234</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161143</link>
		<dc:creator>arti1234</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161143</guid>
		<description>who said tourettes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>who said tourettes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asd</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161087</link>
		<dc:creator>Asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:31:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161087</guid>
		<description>abtruth - I just assumed you had Tourettes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abtruth - I just assumed you had Tourettes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abtruth</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161085</link>
		<dc:creator>abtruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161085</guid>
		<description>damn i hate it when my comment doesnt show then i do a cut down one and then my original one shows.......!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>damn i hate it when my comment doesnt show then i do a cut down one and then my original one shows&#8230;&#8230;.!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abtruth</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161084</link>
		<dc:creator>abtruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161084</guid>
		<description>thats a shame about CRI

let it not be said that we just call for financial accountability from the theological freaks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thats a shame about CRI</p>
<p>let it not be said that we just call for financial accountability from the theological freaks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abtruth</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161081</link>
		<dc:creator>abtruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:16:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161081</guid>
		<description>Thats a shame about CRI .. but HH should be hung out to dry if all allegations are true... and they look plauseable .. if he doesn't make amends.

let it not be said that we don't call for accountability from all in Christian leadership no matter what side of the theological fence they sit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a shame about CRI .. but HH should be hung out to dry if all allegations are true&#8230; and they look plauseable .. if he doesn&#8217;t make amends.</p>
<p>let it not be said that we don&#8217;t call for accountability from all in Christian leadership no matter what side of the theological fence they sit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: abtruth</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161082</link>
		<dc:creator>abtruth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 06:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161082</guid>
		<description>Thats a shame about CRI .. but HH should be hung out to dry if all allegations are true... and they look plauseable .. if he doesn't make amends.

let it not be said that we don't call for accountability from all in Christian leadership no matter what side of the theological fence they sit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thats a shame about CRI .. but HH should be hung out to dry if all allegations are true&#8230; and they look plauseable .. if he doesn&#8217;t make amends.</p>
<p>let it not be said that we don&#8217;t call for accountability from all in Christian leadership no matter what side of the theological fence they sit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wakey74</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161079</link>
		<dc:creator>wakey74</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161079</guid>
		<description>You could always use the "post office lost your donations so send us more money" effort that CRI tried a few years ago
http://www.cultlink.com/news/CRIfraud.htm

The defermation suit brought by CRI was just thrown out
http://www.apologeticsindex.org/515-hank-hanegraaff-lawsuit-thrown-out-of-court</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You could always use the &#8220;post office lost your donations so send us more money&#8221; effort that CRI tried a few years ago<br />
<a href="http://www.cultlink.com/news/CRIfraud.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.cultlink.com/news/CRIfraud.htm</a></p>
<p>The defermation suit brought by CRI was just thrown out<br />
<a href="http://www.apologeticsindex.org/515-hank-hanegraaff-lawsuit-thrown-out-of-court" rel="nofollow">http://www.apologeticsindex.org/515-hank-hanegraaff-lawsuit-thrown-out-of-court</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asd</title>
		<link>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161077</link>
		<dc:creator>Asd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 05:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.signposts.org.au/2007/04/17/how-to-fleece-for-fun-profit-ii/#comment-161077</guid>
		<description>My church isn't big on prophesy so I have to ask - is that an example of prophesy in the modern Christian Church?

Because I am apalled.

All the statements cannot be rebutted 'because they are yet to occur'. That's not prophesy, that's science fiction.

Fame before souls? 

What is the difference between 'WE win and the devil looses' and 'YOU win and the devil looses'. Who is the WE and who is the YOU?

Looks like he phucked up his alliterations as well - instead of the soft 'ph' of physicians he needed the hard 'p' of perverts, protstitutes or proctologists to complete the sentence.

The writing is on the wall alright. How about this for a prophesy 'Mene Mene Tekel Uparsin'? And that's one you can take to the bank.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My church isn&#8217;t big on prophesy so I have to ask - is that an example of prophesy in the modern Christian Church?</p>
<p>Because I am apalled.</p>
<p>All the statements cannot be rebutted &#8216;because they are yet to occur&#8217;. That&#8217;s not prophesy, that&#8217;s science fiction.</p>
<p>Fame before souls? </p>
<p>What is the difference between &#8216;WE win and the devil looses&#8217; and &#8216;YOU win and the devil looses&#8217;. Who is the WE and who is the YOU?</p>
<p>Looks like he phucked up his alliterations as well - instead of the soft &#8216;ph&#8217; of physicians he needed the hard &#8216;p&#8217; of perverts, protstitutes or proctologists to complete the sentence.</p>
<p>The writing is on the wall alright. How about this for a prophesy &#8216;Mene Mene Tekel Uparsin&#8217;? And that&#8217;s one you can take to the bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.540 seconds -->
<!-- Cached page served by WP-Cache -->
<!-- Compression = gzip -->